[OS] relative vs absolute uri in OS schema (for future reference in public)

[Joe]

On 20 fév, 08:49, "Jun Ma" <m... at northwestern.edu> wrote:
> 1. Do the XML files still conform to XML 1.0? Yes; no one suggests otherwise. They are all well-formed.
> 2. Do they conform to the namespaces spec? Yes again.
> 3. Do they conform to our own OSxL.xsd schemas? Of course, we all tested that.

I'm sorry, I have no background nor knowledge on such problems with
namespaces. To be honest, I'm unable to understand most of the
discussions on XML conventions ;)

If you are convinced your OSxL files are conforming to the XML 1.0
conventions, consequently libxml may be wrong. Maybe you should report
this problem to the libxml mailing list (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/
listinfo/xml), a discussion libxml community shoud make things
clearer.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Optimization Services (OS)" group.
To post to this group, send email to optimizationservices at googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to optimizationservices-unsubscribe at googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/optimizationservices?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---