[Os-project-managers] OSgL.xsd

[Jun Ma]

>> 1. The header type is called "GeneralFileHeader". It occurred to me
>> that we do not use the header in a schema, so "SchemaHeader" seemed
>> wrong. "GeneralFileHeader" conveys that it is a header for our files
>> that we generally use but leaves open the possibility, as we discussed
>> yesterday, to define special header information in other schemas. Is
>> this agreeable?
>
> Not really. I prefer instanceHeader, optionHeader, and resultHeader as
> discussed. I think it sounds much better than GeneralFileHeader.
I agree with Kipp (if you mean to use this as the element name).
If you mean to use it as the type name, I am ok with any sensible type name.


>>
>> 2. One child element is called "fileCreatedBy" instead of
>> "fileCreator". It seemed more inclusive when there are multiple
>> creators. Is this agreeable?
>
> Sounds more awkward, but okay.
I don't quite like "fileCreatedBy".
I prefer "fileCreator" or "fileCreators"
Singlular might just as well be ok. because when there are multiple sources, 
we still use <source>
We can discuss.

Jun