[Coin-ipopt] Re: Fortran compiler for IPOPT
Andreas Waechter
andreasw at watson.ibm.com
Mon Nov 7 16:08:44 EST 2005
Hi,
It is also possible to completely avoid to use of a Fortran compiler, by
using the Fortran to C compiler f2c (available on www.netlib.org) to
convert all the Fortran code (Harwell and BLAS) to C.
I know of someone else who has been able to do that, but it a bit of a
pain...
Regards,
Andreas
PS: Fijoy, I just saw that you sent another message to the mailing list,
but it was held by the mailing list daemon, since the attachement was too
long. It seems that you tried to compile code under Cygwin, and tried it
with the Microsoft C++ compiler, and the GNU Fortran compiler. This
doesn't work together.
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, David Ternet wrote:
> There is a free (personal editon) Fortran 95 compiler available from Salford software at:
>
> http://www.salfordsoftware.co.uk/software/downloads/compilers.html
>
> I have not had time to really evaluate it, but it claims to plug-in to Visual Studio .NET or Visual Studio 2003.
>
> thanks,
>
> Dave
>
> coin-ipopt-request at list.coin-or.org wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 13:27:05 -0500
> From: fvadakku at purdue.edu
> Subject: [Coin-ipopt] Fortran compiler for IPOPT
> To: coin-ipopt at list.coin-or.org
> Message-ID: <1131215225.436cf9797729b at webmail.purdue.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to compile IPOPT C++ version on my Intel Celeron Windows XP
> machine using Visual Studio .NET 2003.
>
> Is Intel Fortran compiler necessary for compiling IPOPT C++ version using
> Visual Studio .NET 2003?
>
> If not, what are the alternatives? Are they freely available? Has anybody used
> them? Will they reduce the speed significantly?
>
> Thank you
> Fijoy
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Coin-ipopt Digest, Vol 12, Issue 4
> *****************************************
>
More information about the Coin-ipopt
mailing list