[FlopCpp] constraints over MP_Sets vs over MP_SubSets

Michal Kaut mail at michalkaut.net
Wed Mar 3 03:11:34 EST 2010


Peter,

you can also have a look at pages 5-6 of 
http://www.iot.ntnu.no/users/kaut/papers_etc/COIN-OR_tools_for_SP.pdf
where I tried to summarize my understanding of MP_SubSets and their 
indexing..

Michal


________________________________________
From: flopcpp-bounces at list.coin-or.org 
[flopcpp-bounces at list.coin-or.org] On Behalf Of Peter Sels 
[sels.peter at gmail.com]
Sent: 02 March 2010 11:46
To: flopcpp at list.coin-or.org
Subject: [FlopCpp] constraints over MP_Sets vs over MP_SubSets

Hello all,

1) Is it correct that in formulating FlopC++ constraints,
- when ranging over an MP_Set, one has to (can :) index the constraint
and variables in the constraint with [an MP_variable]
- when ranging over an MP_SubSet one has to index the constraint and
variables in the constraint with [an MP_SubSet [indexed by an
MP_Variable]]? Is this solely because of the guaranteed non-sparseness
of an MP_Set
and the (potential) sparseness of an MP_SubSet?


cheers,

--
Peter

_______________________________________________
FlopCpp mailing list
FlopCpp at list.coin-or.org
http://list.coin-or.org/mailman/listinfo/flopcpp


_______________________________________________
FlopCpp mailing list
FlopCpp at list.coin-or.org
http://list.coin-or.org/mailman/listinfo/flopcpp

----------------------------------------
Freehosting PIPNI - http://www.pipni.cz/



More information about the FlopCpp mailing list