[Coin-discuss] CommonUnitTest: matrix equivalency

[Laszlo Ladanyi]

I won't. Especially that I plan to rewrite the objective value testing :-).
Your ideas were really good ones, I think. Although you have still assumed
that there is a primal and a dual *feasible* solution... The volume alg has
only a dual feasible sol, the primal value might be above or below that...

--Laci

On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Lou Hafer wrote:

> 
> 	Would anyone object if I rewrite the exmip1 matrix equivalency tests
> in OsiSolverInterfaceCommonUnitTest to use the isEquivalent method of the
> CoinPackedMatrix class? The current test is sensitive to the order of entries
> in the elements and indices vectors of the packed matrix. Using isEquivalent
> removes the order sensitivity.
> 
> 	I've written the necessary code, and it seems to work just fine. As
> best I can see from looking through the code, isEquivalent seems to do all
> the tests that are currently performed.
> 
> 						Lou 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Coin-discuss mailing list
> Coin-discuss at www-124.ibm.com
> http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/coin-discuss
>