[Coin-discuss] performance - Osl or Clp??

Xiaoyun Kong kong55 at us.ibm.com
Fri Apr 11 14:06:47 EDT 2003





Any one tried to compare the performance between Osl and Clp? I found Clp
consume much more memory and time than Osl.
Is this typical?

Data1:
OSL:              Minimum Perturbation default algorithm completed.  mem=
1.05 Gbytes time= 0:04:37.23
Clp:              Minimum Perturbation default algorithm completed.  mem=
1.10 Gbytes time= 0:09:48.75
Data2:
OSL:              Minimum Perturbation default algorithm completed.  mem=
1.44 Gbytes time= 0:04:39.65
Clp:              Minimum Perturbation default algorithm completed.  mem=
1.55 Gbytes time= 0:06:45.14

Thanks in advance!


Sharon (Xiaoyun) Kong
==================================================
Manufacturing and Yield Enhancement
IBM EDA Fishkill
Phone:  845-892-4489
T/L:        532-4489




More information about the Coin-discuss mailing list