[Coin-discuss] performance - Osl or Clp??
Xiaoyun Kong
kong55 at us.ibm.com
Fri Apr 11 14:06:47 EDT 2003
Any one tried to compare the performance between Osl and Clp? I found Clp
consume much more memory and time than Osl.
Is this typical?
Data1:
OSL: Minimum Perturbation default algorithm completed. mem=
1.05 Gbytes time= 0:04:37.23
Clp: Minimum Perturbation default algorithm completed. mem=
1.10 Gbytes time= 0:09:48.75
Data2:
OSL: Minimum Perturbation default algorithm completed. mem=
1.44 Gbytes time= 0:04:39.65
Clp: Minimum Perturbation default algorithm completed. mem=
1.55 Gbytes time= 0:06:45.14
Thanks in advance!
Sharon (Xiaoyun) Kong
==================================================
Manufacturing and Yield Enhancement
IBM EDA Fishkill
Phone: 845-892-4489
T/L: 532-4489
More information about the Coin-discuss
mailing list