[Clp] [coin-or/Clp] minor changes for infeasible difficult problems (1d65c46)

John Forrest john.forrest at fastercoin.com
Thu Jan 26 05:13:23 EST 2017


Pierre,

Yes - the CoinAssert should be commented.  In fact it was - 9 months ago 
with change 2217.

                          // set non basic free variables to fake bounds
                          // I don't think we should ever get here
               // yes we can if basis goes singular twice in succession!
                          //CoinAssert(!("should not be here"));

John Forrest


On 25/01/17 23:45, Pierre Moulon wrote:
>
> @jjhforrest <https://github.com/jjhforrest> I confirm that have the 
> CoinAssert as a comment is valuable.
> I use some LP feasibility test in some Bisection loops for computer 
> vision problems and updating to CLP: 1.16.10 make on of my unit test 
> fails.
>
> Here the summary of the discussion
> openMVG/openMVG#740 <https://github.com/openMVG/openMVG/issues/740>
>
>> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub 
> <https://github.com/coin-or/Clp/commit/1d65c46b4d4fe4c047fb6ae0b6e46a376dc8bee0#commitcomment-20619040>, 
> or mute the thread 
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGycHAgz5H6iMOzOrmZ--VumnJqEIsxwks5rV961gaJpZM4LuJHv>.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.coin-or.org/pipermail/clp/attachments/20170126/2c47a1b9/attachment.html>


More information about the Clp mailing list