[OS-tickets] [Optimization Services] #38: Discrepancies between OSgL schema and C++ implementation in OSDataStructures

[Optimization Services]

#38: Discrepancies between OSgL schema and C++ implementation in
OSDataStructures
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  Gassmann    |       Owner:  somebody                                 
      Type:  task        |      Status:  new                                      
  Priority:  major       |   Milestone:                                           
 Component:  component1  |     Version:  2.0                                      
Resolution:              |    Keywords:  OSgL schema, implementation, constitution
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Description changed by kmartin:

Old description:

> SparseVector in OSDataStructures has
>     int* indexes;
>     double* values;
>
> For consistence with OSgL it should be
>     IntVector* idx;
>     DoubleVector* nonz;

New description:

 SparseVector in OSDataStructures has
     int* indexes;
     double* values;

 For consistence with OSgL it should be
     IntVector* idx;
     DoubleVector* nonz;

 Kipp Comment -- I think it would be a mistake to have to define an object
 for each element in an array. For example,

 IntVector* idx;

 seems far more cumbersome than

 int* indexes;

 Having a constructor and destructor called for each nonzero could take a
 lot time for large problems.

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://projects.coin-or.org/OS/ticket/38#comment:1>
Optimization Services <http://projects.coin-or.org/OS>
An interface for Web services implementing optimization.