[Os-project-managers] Quick question about GeneralFileHeader

[Kipp Martin]

Hi Gus:
> 
> Thanks, Jun. I understood that to say that in OSiL we should make the  
> <instanceHeader> optional as well. I have implemented optional  
> elements <optionHeader> and <resultHeader> in OSoL and OSrL, but I  
> have kept the <instanceHeader> required. (Mostly because I have some  
> trepidation about messing with Kipp's code...B) ) I have no objection  
> to making it optional.

Just to show you how confused I always am, I thought <instanceHeader> 
WAS optional. I have no objection to making it optional, but yes, we 
will have to change the parser.

Cheers
> 
> Cheers
> 
> gus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Os-project-managers mailing list
> Os-project-managers at list.coin-or.org
> http://list.coin-or.org/mailman/listinfo/os-project-managers


-- 
Kipp Martin
Professor of Operations Research
and Computing Technology
Booth School of Business
University of Chicago
5807 South Woodlawn Avenue
Chicago, IL 60637
773-702-7456
kmartin at chicagobooth.edu
http://www.chicagobooth.edu/faculty/bio.aspx?person_id=12825325568
http://projects.coin-or.org/OS