[Os-project-managers] Question about OSoL and OSrL

[Kipp Martin]

Hi Gus:
> 
> I know that I am making more work for myself, but it occurred to me  
> that the OSoL (and OSrL) schemas are lacking the file information we  
> provide in the OSiL files in form of the <instanceHeader>. Trying to  
> debug the OSoL parser and the unit test I am forced to look at old  
> osol files that I wrote to test the osol parser that existed at that  
> time, and it would now be useful to have had some information as to  
> what I was thinking at the time.
> 
> I propose to add the following optional information:
> 
> <optionHeader>
>      <name>
>      <author>
>      <source>
>      <description>
> 
> (and similarly for <resultHeader>). I also propose to add <author> to  
> the <instanceHeader> in OSiL.
> 
> Since this is optional stuff, I hope we can treat this as a consent  
> agenda item.
> 
> Any thoughts?

I consent and think it is a good idea. But where would it go? Would 
<optionHeader> be a child of <general> or would it go before <general>?

Cheers
> 
> Cheers
> 
> gus
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Os-project-managers mailing list
> Os-project-managers at list.coin-or.org
> http://list.coin-or.org/mailman/listinfo/os-project-managers


-- 
Kipp Martin
Professor of Operations Research
and Computing Technology
Booth School of Business
University of Chicago
5807 South Woodlawn Avenue
Chicago, IL 60637
773-702-7456
kmartin at chicagobooth.edu
http://www.chicagobooth.edu/faculty/bio.aspx?person_id=12825325568
http://projects.coin-or.org/OS