[Ipopt] Problem in step computation; switching to emergency mode.
Ludo Daemen
ludo.daemen at gmail.com
Sat Jun 23 18:08:45 EDT 2012
I'm using IPOPT (through the java-interface on windows XP) to solve large
regularized regression problems.
The program has already been used regularly but is now failing on a large
problem (larger then everything we did before).
Any pointers to the cause of the problem are greatly appreciated.
I give below an extract of the normal log as well as some extracts of the
detailed log file
regards,
Ludo.
LOG
Number of nonzeros in equality constraint Jacobian...: 711199
Number of nonzeros in inequality constraint Jacobian.: 225537
Number of nonzeros in Lagrangian Hessian.............: 225610
Total number of variables............................: 225610
variables with only lower bounds: 0
variables with lower and upper bounds: 225610
variables with only upper bounds: 0
Total number of equality constraints.................: 73
Total number of inequality constraints...............: 1
inequality constraints with only lower bounds: 0
inequality constraints with lower and upper bounds: 1
inequality constraints with only upper bounds: 0
iter objective inf_pr inf_du lg(mu) ||d|| lg(rg) alpha_du
alpha_pr ls
0 4.8822836e+001 1.56e-003 1.33e-001 -1.0 0.00e+000 - 0.00e+000
0.00e+000 0
WARNING: Problem in step computation; switching to emergency mode.
1r4.8822836e+001 1.56e-003 9.38e+002 -1.0 0.00e+000 20.0 0.00e+000
0.00e+000R 1
WARNING: Problem in step computation; switching to emergency mode.
Restoration phase is called at point that is almost feasible,
with constraint violation 0.000000e+000. Abort.
Restoration phase in the restoration phase failed.
AT THE TOP OF THE IPOPT-LOG FILE
Scaling parameter for objective function = 1.000000e+000
Equality constraints are not scaled.
Inequality constraints are not scaled.
Initial values of x sufficiently inside the bounds.
Moved initial values of s sufficiently inside the bounds.
MUMPS used permuting_scaling 5 and pivot_order 6.
scaling will be -2.
In MumpsSolverInterface::Factorization: negevals_ = 0, but numberOfNegEVals
= 74
Factorization failed with retval = 2
SOMEWHAT FURTHER DOWN THERE ARE THE FOLLOWING MESSAGES :
**************************************************
*** Solving the Primal Dual System for Iteration 0:
**************************************************
In MumpsSolverInterface::Factorization: negevals_ = 0, but numberOfNegEVals
= 74
Factorization failed with retval = 2
Number of negative eigenvalues too small!
Asking augmented system solver to improve quality of its solutions.
Increasing pivot tolerance for MUMPS from 1.00e-006 to 1.00e-003.
In MumpsSolverInterface::Factorization: negevals_ = 0, but numberOfNegEVals
= 74
Factorization failed with retval = 2
Number of negative eigenvalues too small!
Degeneracy test for hess_degenerate_ = 0 and jac_degenerate_ = 0
test_status_ = 1
In MumpsSolverInterface::Factorization: negevals_ = 0, but numberOfNegEVals
= 74
Factorization failed with retval = 2
Number of negative eigenvalues too small!
Degeneracy test for hess_degenerate_ = 0 and jac_degenerate_ = 0
test_status_ = 2
In MumpsSolverInterface::Factorization: negevals_ = 0, but numberOfNegEVals
= 74
Factorization failed with retval = 2
Number of negative eigenvalues too small!
Degeneracy test for hess_degenerate_ = 0 and jac_degenerate_ = 0
test_status_ = 3
In MumpsSolverInterface::Factorization: negevals_ = 0, but numberOfNegEVals
= 74
Factorization failed with retval = 2
Number of negative eigenvalues too small!
Degeneracy test for hess_degenerate_ = 0 and jac_degenerate_ = 0
test_status_ = 4
In MumpsSolverInterface::Factorization: negevals_ = 0, but numberOfNegEVals
= 74
Factorization failed with retval = 2
Number of negative eigenvalues too small!
Degeneracy test for hess_degenerate_ = 0 and jac_degenerate_ = 0
test_status_ = 4
In MumpsSolverInterface::Factorization: negevals_ = 0, but numberOfNegEVals
= 74
Factorization failed with retval = 2
Number of negative eigenvalues too small!
Degeneracy test for hess_degenerate_ = 0 and jac_degenerate_ = 0
test_status_ = 4
In MumpsSolverInterface::Factorization: negevals_ = 0, but numberOfNegEVals
= 74
Factorization failed with retval = 2
Number of negative eigenvalues too small!
Degeneracy test for hess_degenerate_ = 0 and jac_degenerate_ = 0
test_status_ = 4
In MumpsSolverInterface::Factorization: negevals_ = 0, but numberOfNegEVals
= 74
Factorization failed with retval = 2
Number of negative eigenvalues too small!
Degeneracy test for hess_degenerate_ = 0 and jac_degenerate_ = 0
test_status_ = 4
In MumpsSolverInterface::Factorization: negevals_ = 0, but numberOfNegEVals
= 74
Factorization failed with retval = 2
Number of negative eigenvalues too small!
Degeneracy test for hess_degenerate_ = 0 and jac_degenerate_ = 0
test_status_ = 4
In MumpsSolverInterface::Factorization: negevals_ = 0, but numberOfNegEVals
= 74
Factorization failed with retval = 2
Number of negative eigenvalues too small!
Degeneracy test for hess_degenerate_ = 0 and jac_degenerate_ = 0
test_status_ = 4
In MumpsSolverInterface::Factorization: negevals_ = 0, but numberOfNegEVals
= 74
Factorization failed with retval = 2
Number of negative eigenvalues too small!
Degeneracy test for hess_degenerate_ = 0 and jac_degenerate_ = 0
test_status_ = 4
In MumpsSolverInterface::Factorization: negevals_ = 0, but numberOfNegEVals
= 74
Factorization failed with retval = 2
Number of negative eigenvalues too small!
Degeneracy test for hess_degenerate_ = 0 and jac_degenerate_ = 0
test_status_ = 4
In MumpsSolverInterface::Factorization: negevals_ = 0, but numberOfNegEVals
= 74
Factorization failed with retval = 2
Number of negative eigenvalues too small!
Degeneracy test for hess_degenerate_ = 0 and jac_degenerate_ = 0
test_status_ = 4
In MumpsSolverInterface::Factorization: negevals_ = 0, but numberOfNegEVals
= 74
Factorization failed with retval = 2
Number of negative eigenvalues too small!
Degeneracy test for hess_degenerate_ = 0 and jac_degenerate_ = 0
test_status_ = 4
In MumpsSolverInterface::Factorization: negevals_ = 0, but numberOfNegEVals
= 74
Factorization failed with retval = 2
Number of negative eigenvalues too small!
Degeneracy test for hess_degenerate_ = 0 and jac_degenerate_ = 0
test_status_ = 4
delta_x perturbation is becoming too large: 1.000000e+022
PerturbForSingularity can't be done for assume singular.
*** Step could not be computed in iteration 0!
Fallback option activated in BacktrackingLineSearch!
WARNING: Problem in step computation; switching to emergency mode.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.coin-or.org/pipermail/ipopt/attachments/20120624/442a8028/attachment.html>
More information about the Ipopt
mailing list