[Coin-ipopt] (no subject)

Nguyen An Danh andanh at iam.rwth-aachen.de
Wed Nov 9 12:56:33 EST 2005


Hi,
Could you show me how to overcome this difficulty.  I performed the following 
problem on Linux system of 4Gb.
Thank you in advance.
Danh.

Parameter IMAXITER             has multiple assignments - using  0.10000D+05 .
******************************************************************************
This program contains IPOPT, a program for large-scale nonlinear optimization.
   IPOPT is released as open source under the Common Public License (CPL).
               For more information visit www.coin-or.org/Ipopt
******************************************************************************

  Going to allocate double precision work space of size         13343572
                             integer work space of size         19017588


Number of variables           :   112001
   of which are fixed         :        0
Number of constraints         :    26955
Number of lower bounds        :        1
Number of upper bounds        :    16000
Number of nonzeros in Jacobian:  1880872
Number of nonzeros in Hessian :   432001
 get_scale: |g|_inf =    1.00000000000000
 get_scale: QFSCALE =    1.00000000000000
 get_scale: smallest CSCALE =    1.00000000000000
get_scale: No scaling of constraints necessary

ITER     ERR       MU      ||C||   ||YPY||  ||PZ||     ||D||   ALFA(V)   
ALFA(X)     NU   #LS       F      #cor   Regu    CPU(s)
    0 .605D+05p .100D+00 .506D+07 .000D+00 .000D+00  .000D+00 .000D+00  .000D
+00  .000D+00  0 -.67500332D+01  0 .000D+00 .496D+01
 ma27_call:  LIWMA increased from     6129572 to    24785287
 ma27_call:  LA increased from     8522302 to    24785287
 ma27_call:  LIWMA increased from    24785287 to    68396777
 ma27_call:  LA increased from    24785287 to    68396777
Constraints not dependent.
Hessian not dependent.
    1 .594D+05p .100D+00 .496D+07 .000D+00 .000D+00  .506D
+07 .164D-06d .187D-01f .000D+00  1 -.67500341D+01  1 .100D-03 .361D+03
    2 .594D+05p .100D+00 .496D+07 .000D+00 .000D+00  .496D
+07 .186D-01p .191D-03h .000D+00  1 -.67500340D+01 14 .699D+14 .677D+03
    3 .594D+05p .119D+05 .496D+07 .000D+00 .000D+00  .496D
+07 .188D-01r .184D-05- .000D+00  2 -.67500340D+01 10 .489D+24 .987D+03
filter: Request reinitialization of LAMBDA.
    4 .939D+05p .100D+00 .495D+07 .000D+00 .000D+00  .709D
+09 .778D-03r .582D-02f .000D+00  1 -.10783351D+02  0 .000D+00 .990D+03
    5 .939D+05p .188D+05 .495D+07 .000D+00 .000D+00  .495D+07 .981D
+00r .629D-05- .000D+00  4 -.10783351D+02  1 .163D+24 .129D+04
    6 .176D+06c .188D+05 .511D+07 .000D+00 .000D+00  .151D+10 .100D
+01r .146D-03f .000D+00  1 -.10966326D+02  0 .000D+00 .129D+04
    7 .111D+06c .188D+05 .495D+07 .000D+00 .000D+00  .248D+07 .930D+00r .111D
+00f .000D+00  1 -.10966558D+02  0 .000D+00 .129D+04
    8 .992D+05p .188D+05 .486D+07 .000D+00 .000D+00  .162D+07 .926D+00r .161D
+00f .000D+00  1 -.10966580D+02  0 .000D+00 .130D+04
    9 .992D+05p .188D+05 .481D+07 .000D+00 .000D+00  .111D+07 .925D+00r .167D
+00f .000D+00  1 -.10966531D+02  0 .000D+00 .130D+04
filter: Request reinitialization of LAMBDA.

ITER     ERR       MU      ||C||   ||YPY||  ||PZ||     ||D||   ALFA(V)   
ALFA(X)     NU   #LS       F      #cor   Regu    CPU(s)
   10 .992D+05p .100D+00 .479D+07 .000D+00 .000D+00  .806D+06 .923D+00r .184D
+00f .000D+00  1 -.10966668D+02  0 .000D+00 .130D+04
  Largest entry in LAMBDA is too large:   164122.020999873
 Setting LAMBDA to zero.
 ma27_call:  LIWMA increased from    68396777 to   173579105
 ma27_call:  LA increased from    68396777 to   173579105
 ma27_call:  LIWMA increased from   173579105 to   563262077
 ma27_call:  LA increased from   173579105 to   563262077
 ma27_call:  LIWMA increased from   563262077 to  2079614087
 ma27_call:  LA increased from   563262077 to  2079614087
 get_step_full: IP_MALLOC returned           -1 for KKT (realloc)
 solve_barrier: get_step_full returns IERR =           96
 mainloop: Error: solve_barrier ends with IERR =           96

Number of iterations taken .............                     10
Final value of objective function is....-0.1096666791164388D+02

Errors at final point                      (scaled)  (unscaled)
Final maximal constraint violation is... 0.992242D+05    0.992242D+05
Final value for dual infeasibility is... 0.332702D+04    0.164129D+06
Final value of complementarity error is. 0.323538D+05    0.428481D+07

The objective function was evaluated     17 times.
The constraints were evaluated           17 times.

EXIT: Error during dynamic memory allocation

CPU seconds spent in IPOPT and function evaluations =       3303.3800


 An error occoured after           10  Iterations.
 The error code is           96




More information about the Coin-ipopt mailing list