[Csdp] Csdp Digest, Vol 32, Issue 3

Dehghanpoor, Golnoosh g.dehghanpoor at wustl.edu
Tue Jul 21 18:30:20 EDT 2015


Thanks for the note. The primal side is infeasible with a very small ratio.


Regards,

Golnoosh.

________________________________
From: csdp-bounces at list.coin-or.org <csdp-bounces at list.coin-or.org> on behalf of Imre Pólik <imre.polik at gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 12:06 PM
To: csdp at list.coin-or.org
Subject: Re: [Csdp] Csdp Digest, Vol 32, Issue 3

You may want to post the error measures from the sedumi solve. You can get them by setting pars.errors=1.
Imre

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:00 PM, <csdp-request at list.coin-or.org<mailto:csdp-request at list.coin-or.org>> wrote:
Send Csdp mailing list submissions to
        csdp at list.coin-or.org<mailto:csdp at list.coin-or.org>

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://list.coin-or.org/mailman/listinfo/csdp
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        csdp-request at list.coin-or.org<mailto:csdp-request at list.coin-or.org>

You can reach the person managing the list at
        csdp-owner at list.coin-or.org<mailto:csdp-owner at list.coin-or.org>

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Csdp digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. comparison of CSDP and SeDumi (Dehghanpoor, Golnoosh)
   2. Re: comparison of CSDP and SeDumi (Brian Borchers)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 20:26:28 +0000
From: "Dehghanpoor, Golnoosh" <g.dehghanpoor at wustl.edu<mailto:g.dehghanpoor at wustl.edu>>
To: "csdp at list.coin-or.org<mailto:csdp at list.coin-or.org>" <csdp at list.coin-or.org<mailto:csdp at list.coin-or.org>>
Subject: [Csdp] comparison of CSDP and SeDumi
Message-ID:
        <BN3PR0201MB09610D9339DBA7DE87FE65FBEB850 at BN3PR0201MB0961.namprd02.prod.outlook.com<mailto:BN3PR0201MB09610D9339DBA7DE87FE65FBEB850 at BN3PR0201MB0961.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi,


I'm trying to solve a SDP problem with CSDP (from gloptipoly package) , which I've previously run with SeDumi and have gotten answer. But CSDP finds the same problem infeasible. Do you know what might be causing the problem? (I had to change [0 nsdpblocks+1 i i -c(i)] to full([0 nsdpblocks+1 i i -c(i)]) in fprintf in writedspa function to get the code working). Thanks for your time.


Regards,

Golnoosh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.coin-or.org/pipermail/csdp/attachments/20150720/6325404a/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:50:18 -0600
From: Brian Borchers <borchers at nmt.edu<mailto:borchers at nmt.edu>>
To: "Dehghanpoor, Golnoosh" <g.dehghanpoor at wustl.edu<mailto:g.dehghanpoor at wustl.edu>>
Cc: "csdp at list.coin-or.org<mailto:csdp at list.coin-or.org>" <csdp at list.coin-or.org<mailto:csdp at list.coin-or.org>>
Subject: Re: [Csdp] comparison of CSDP and SeDumi
Message-ID:
        <CAE-H=HSPw6Hd2QpZi9WMfyuk91=C2SZc5tv_JDwrdjJVT6wMyQ at mail.gmail.com<mailto:C2SZc5tv_JDwrdjJVT6wMyQ at mail.gmail.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Without seeing the problem, I can't give any sort of complete answer to
this question.

One common issue is that  SeDuMi has different requirements for feasibility
than the other primal-dual interior point codes in that it will allow
either the X or Z variable to have slightly negative eigenvalues, while
CSDP, SDPT3, and SDPA all require that these variables have Cholesky
factorizations.  There are many badly posed problems that are right on the
edge of feasibility with respect to this issue.


On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Dehghanpoor, Golnoosh <
g.dehghanpoor at wustl.edu<mailto:g.dehghanpoor at wustl.edu>> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
>
>  I'm trying to solve a SDP problem with CSDP (from gloptipoly package) ,
> which I've previously run with SeDumi and have gotten answer. But CSDP
> finds the same problem infeasible. Do you know what might be causing the
> problem? (I had to change [0 nsdpblocks+1 i i -c(i)] to full([0
> nsdpblocks+1 i i -c(i)]) in fprintf in writedspa function to get the code
> working). Thanks for your time.
>
>
>  Regards,
> Golnoosh
>
> _______________________________________________
> Csdp mailing list
> Csdp at list.coin-or.org<mailto:Csdp at list.coin-or.org>
> http://list.coin-or.org/mailman/listinfo/csdp
>
>


--
Brian Borchers                          borchers at nmt.edu<mailto:borchers at nmt.edu>
Department of Mathematics      http://www.nmt.edu/~borchers/
New Mexico Tech                       Phone: (575) 322-2592<tel:%28575%29%20322-2592>
Socorro, NM 87801                   FAX: (575) 835-5366<tel:%28575%29%20835-5366>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.coin-or.org/pipermail/csdp/attachments/20150720/6f4bd4c5/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Csdp mailing list
Csdp at list.coin-or.org<mailto:Csdp at list.coin-or.org>
http://list.coin-or.org/mailman/listinfo/csdp


End of Csdp Digest, Vol 32, Issue 3
***********************************



--
http://imre.polik.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.coin-or.org/pipermail/csdp/attachments/20150721/4c8d704b/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Csdp mailing list