[CppAD] CppAD License

[Brad Bell]

Perhaps the Boost license would be open enought that no one would 
complain about it. See
   http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt

> Wang, James (ON98) wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As Brad mentioned that it'll be up to users.  I vote for CPL as well.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>
> I'm a user.
> We are developing a GPL multibody code (mbdyn, www.mbdyn.org ),
> and we are planning to distribute a version with
> CppAD.
> Unfortunately, according to FSF, CPL is incompatible with GPL,
> and this would prevent the redistribution of CppAD.
> What about a double-licensing scheme, CPL and GPL?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marco Morandini
> _______________________________________________
> CppAD mailing list
> CppAD at list.coin-or.org
> http://list.coin-or.org/mailman/listinfo/cppad
>
>