[Coin-discuss] UnitTest framework

Matthew Saltzman mjs at clemson.edu
Sun Feb 28 19:17:43 EST 2010


On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 11:01 +1100, Leo Lopes wrote: 
> Since it is bsd-licensed (thus open source) I don't think there is any
> problem. Thanks for offering to help!

Depending on how the package is incorporated, simply being open source
might not be enough to make it usable by us, but BSD-style licenses
shouldn't be a problem.

Matt

> 
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Laszlo Ladanyi <ladanyi at us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > True, but TestTools just builds and runs the unitTest. I think what Gaetano
> > was asking is if there is any policy wrt. using third-party tools (in this
> > case gTools) in the unitTest. I don't think there's any policy, and
> > personally I think it's OK. The only thing is that gTools would have to be
> > added to ThirdParty, so it'd be easy to get everything necessary to build
> > and test FlopC++.
> >
> > --Laci
> >
> > coin-discuss-bounces at list.coin-or.org wrote on 02/28/2010 07:47:38 AM:
> >
> >>
> >> FlopC++ is currently being tested by TestTools on several platforms.
> >>
> >> JP _______________________________________________
> >> Coin-discuss mailing list
> >> Coin-discuss at list.coin-or.org
> >> http://list.coin-or.org/mailman/listinfo/coin-discuss
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Coin-discuss mailing list
> > Coin-discuss at list.coin-or.org
> > http://list.coin-or.org/mailman/listinfo/coin-discuss
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 

-- 
                Matthew Saltzman

Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs





More information about the Coin-discuss mailing list