[Coin-discuss] yet another forgotten so-name change?

[Soeren Sonnenburg]

On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 12:51 +0100, Stefan Vigerske wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 10:54 +0100, Stefan Vigerske wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> >>> I was trying to get coinutils up-to-date but uploading version 2.6.0 to
> >>> debian caused build failures in almost all other coin packages (see
> >>> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=sonne@debian.org )
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> One of the reasons is that coinutils forgets to install CoinOslC.h
> >> I merged a fix from trunk to stable/2.6 for this issue. Do you need a
> >> new release now?
> > 
> > Yes thanks, that would help! Can you do that immediately? Or should I
> > for the time being just copy that file?
> 
> There is a 2.6.1 now.

where? It is not here yet
http://www.coin-or.org/download/source/CoinUtils/ ?

> >>> But in addition coinor-osi fails to build since some things changed in
> >>> the API right?
> >> Yes. Osi 0.102 should work with CoinUtils 2.6.
> > 
> > But why not 0.100.2 ...?
> 
> The third number is reserved for releases from the same stable branch
> (no API change).
> So, after 0.100 the next stable versions are 0.101, 0.102,...

but shouldn't this then be reflected in the soname of the lib?

Soeren
-- 
For the one fact about the future of which we can be certain is that it
will be utterly fantastic. -- Arthur C. Clarke, 1962
 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://list.coin-or.org/pipermail/coin-discuss/attachments/20100226/483623bd/attachment.sig>