[Coin-discuss] parameter parser
Matthew Saltzman
mjs at clemson.edu
Sat Feb 10 18:56:13 EST 2007
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Alan King wrote:
>
> I looked at the boost object, and I agree that is a very good solution.
> What is the problem incorporating boost components into COIN?
When we first looked at boost, there were license issues. Circumstances
have changed since then, but we haven't reviewed the issue since. We
should look at Boost again, but one way or another, we ought to unify this
parameter utility across projects.
--
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
More information about the Coin-discuss
mailing list