[Coin-discuss] unitTest (deSmedt cases) resolve prior to initialSolve?
Matthew Saltzman
mjs at ces.clemson.edu
Tue Apr 29 13:06:39 EDT 2003
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Lou Hafer wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm looking at the deSmedt test cases, and they uniformly call resolve()
> without a call to initialSolve(). I thought this was illegal. Am I wrong in my
> interpretation?
No, I believe that's what we intended (that it be illegal).
>
> Lou
--
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs at clemson.edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
More information about the Coin-discuss
mailing list