[Coin-discuss] unitTest (deSmedt cases) resolve prior to initialSolve?

Matthew Saltzman mjs at ces.clemson.edu
Tue Apr 29 13:06:39 EDT 2003


On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Lou Hafer wrote:

> Folks,
>
> 	I'm looking at the deSmedt test cases, and they uniformly call resolve()
> without a call to initialSolve(). I thought this was illegal. Am I wrong in my
> interpretation?

No, I believe that's what we intended (that it be illegal).

>
> 							Lou

-- 
		Matthew Saltzman

Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs at clemson.edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs



More information about the Coin-discuss mailing list