<div dir="ltr"><div><div>Babak, <br>I assume that the downloaded Clp executable is built using Intel's C++ compiler, and that your compilation relies on MVS's compiler. So I would guess that the differences in running times are due to compiler differences. <br>
<br></div>Does anyone have experience with comparing running times for the clp code using different compilers?<br><br></div>Regards, Arild Helseth<br> <br><div><div><div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Babak Moazzez <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bmoazzez@ucdavis.edu" target="_blank">bmoazzez@ucdavis.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">I downloaded a Win32 binary .exe file from Clp website, which was version 1.7. <br><br>I compiled version 1.9 on my computer using MVS 2008. the older version looks to be faster. What might be the reason?<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br clear="all">
<div><br><div dir="ltr">Babak Moazzez<br><br></div>
</div></font></span></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Clp mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Clp@list.coin-or.org">Clp@list.coin-or.org</a><br>
<a href="http://list.coin-or.org/mailman/listinfo/clp" target="_blank">http://list.coin-or.org/mailman/listinfo/clp</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>