<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Ryan,<br>
<br>
Are you sure they are the same?<br>
<br>
I get 80985022 using with-SOS (no_change 1) and 81001582 using
no-SOS. If they are equivalent then fixing has_change to 0 in
no-SOS should be same as fixing no_change to 1 in with-SOS - but
the two LP relaxations have different objective values.<br>
<br>
John<br>
On 01/01/18 19:06, Rhavar wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:-ev4_lbhUsjI2XfLJAs8t_sLt97__RmwIkuDmXeAbpAEcEAMUB84L-avv8n7AKC2yi4m0BIUf5l0C5az5sNV_9MpLlu3Ro4EUY0MwvMXcCE=@protonmail.com">
<div>Sorry, I got that in reverse. <br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a
href="https://gist.github.com/RHavar/35479c3f6d7f91963b089615859543a6"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://gist.github.com/RHavar/35479c3f6d7f91963b089615859543a6</a><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The two problems should logically be equivalent to each
other, however the one with SOS gives a better optimal than the
one without.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div class="protonmail_signature_block">
<div class="protonmail_signature_block-user">
<div>-Ryan<br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="protonmail_signature_block-proton
protonmail_signature_block-empty"><br>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>